Inherit the Wind

We are ready to represent the best custom paper writing assistance that can cope with any task like Inherit the Wind even at the eleventh hour. The matter is that we posses the greatest base of expert writers. Our staff of freelance writers includes approximately 300 experienced writers are at your disposal all year round. They are striving to provide the best ever services to the most desperate students that have already lost the hope for academic success. We offer the range of the most widely required, however, not recommended for college use papers. It is advisable to use our examples like Inherit the Wind in learning at public-education level. Get prepared and be smart with our best essay samples cheap and fast! Get in touch and we will write excellent custom coursework or essay especially for you.

INHERIT THE WIND

Growing up as children we tend to look up to characters such as Batman and Robin, who together were able to protect and serve Gotham City. Other heroes and heroines would be the people who do the little things that have major impacts on our lives such as teachers, mentors, and families. In the book Inherit the Wind, there are several different characters who have roles with the purpose of making themselves a hero or heroin. A true hero or heroin is one who is able to be in the right spot at the right time and able to help so many people at one time. I would have to say that the true hero of this book is Henry Drummond the defense attorney for Bertram Cates purely for several reasons. It appears that Drummond has a stubborn side to him when it came to choosing the jury for the trial, he is also a superior lawyer when it comes to cross-examination for witnesses, he is also one who is not bias when it comes to the views of religion and evolution, and a well spoken individual.

The first trait that will be discussed would have to be that Drummond has a stubborn side to him. There are a few examples of this trait and to start would be the scene when Drummond tells Dunlap that he has “No questions. Not acceptable.” (pg41) Then from that point Brady gets mad and tells the Judge that it is not right for there to be any questions asked to Mr. Dunlap. That is when Drummond makes the comment “How are you?” (pg41) to the witness, then excuses him. This trait can be looked at as a good trait or a bad one from some peoples point of view, but as a lawyer that is strongly disliked in this case it would be a dreadful trait. The part that sets Drummond off is when the Judge addresses Brady as Colonel Brady and Drummond rises angry and makes the comment “I object to all this damned “Colonel” talk. I am not familiar with Mr. Brandy’s military record.” (pg4) Then Drummond goes on to explain how this is not fair for his client and that he would like the Judge to change the title of Brady’s to “Private Brady”(pg4) and followed by the mayor saying that “We can’t take it back!” (pg4). Another part of the book when Drummond shows his stubborn side is when Brady is talking to Sillers and makes the statement, “What would you think if that sweet child came home from school and told you that a Godless teacher”(pg44) Drummond at this point waste no time to say “Objection! We’re supposed to be choosing jury members! The prosecution’s denouncing the defendant before the trial has even begun!”(pg44) This is a good example of a lawyer who is not going to let this bullshit go on during a trial for a mans life. These examples of Drummond clearly show how he can goes to far and pushes the limit with people.

The second trait of Drummond that will be discussed is how well he is able to cross-examine the witness during the trial. When Howard takes the stand he makes the statement “I guess that is what Mr. Darwin thought it up.”(pg71) then Drummond says “You figure anything’s wrong about that, Howard.”(pg71). Next the Judge goes on to tell Drummond “the right to think is not on trial here”(pg71) that is when the trait of how good he is at examining the witness comes out because at the point that is when he makes the statement “With all respect to the bench, I hold that the right to think is very much on trial!”(pg7) This point that Drummond just made goes to show the reader that he knows what the trial should be about and how the town and the court room think it is over a man. When Drummond cross-examines the witness he is seeking to make the jury think about everything that is being presented and that is what a good lawyer is supposed to do. The best example of cross-examination would be when Drummond called to the stand Brady to be an expert witness on the bible. At this point it becomes apparent that Drummond is doing everything that would try to open the eyes of the jury. This is an example of heroism from the stand point that Drummond is giving it his all to change the view of the court room by just the cross-examinations.




The last trait of how Drummond was good at cross-examination alone shows part of the reason of why he is the hero which leads to the next area of discussion. It is how Drummond during the trial is not bias in anyway towards religion or evolution which shows how he holds high respect towards both types of people. The first example that comes up would be when Drummond tries to bring up “Dr. Amos D. Keller who is the head of the Department of Zoology”(pg80) and Brady says “objection.” (pg80) Then a little discouraged Drummond then calls “Dr. Keller on the stand to explain to the gentlemen of the jury exactly what the evolutionary is. How can they pass judgment on it if they don’t know what it’s all about?”(pg81) These two examples show how Drummond is trying so hard to show the court both sides of the evolution and then comes maybe the best part of the book. After all the objections Drummond makes a move that most lawyers would never do and he called to the stand Brady to be the expert witness on the Bible. Drummond asks the question “in the beginning” there were only Adam and Eve, and Cain and Abel, where’d this extra women spring from.”(pg0) Then he asks if it “Never bothered you” to Brady. This just shows how Drummond is not bias against religion but more so trying to make a picture for that the jury that it is ok to think about these things to get a better understanding for the truth. This also leads us into the next trait of how Drummond is such an exceptional speaker to the courtroom.

The fourth and final trait that will be looked at is how Drummond is such a great speaker both in and out of the courtroom. The key to this trait is when Drummond makes the statement,

“Then why did God plague us with the power to think? Mr. Brady, why do you deny the one faculty which lifts man above all other creatures on the earth the power of his brain to reason. What other merit have we? The elephant is larger, the horse is stronger and swifter, the butterfly more beautiful, the mosquito more prolific, even the simple sponge is more durable! Or does a sponge think.”(pg-4)

This is a good example of how Drummond shows how he can change the mood of a room and make people really think about what is going on and that is a good trait of a good speaker. Drummond goes on to ask the question “Does man have the same privileges that a sponge does?”(pg4) and the response from Brady was “Of course”(pg4). At this point it is when it is obvious that he is a good speaker simple because he now starts to roar and point to Cates and makes the announcement “This man wishes to be accorded the same privileges as a sponge! He wishes to think!”(pg4). This once again shows how Drummond is an excellent presenter because of the attitude change in him and makes the people in court think.

After reading this paper it becomes obvious that Drummond is the true hero of the book even if he did not win the case by the jury. He won the case in my view on the fact that he changed the views of the town by showing them that it is ok to think. Drummond meets the requirements of a hero because he did the little things that are going to go a long way to help this town. Like Batman and Robin save the town of Gotham it was Drummond that saved the town of Dayton from the only being about to see things one way and not really able to see or think of other things that they were not taught. Drummond is the hero just on the fact that all odds were against him the whole time and still showed the town how thinking should be viewed as a good thing and can help the townspeople in life. It is pretty obvious that Drummond is the hero based on the evidence that he is stubborn when it comes up to selecting a jury he makes it up by skillfully cross-examinations of witnesses, not being bias when it comes to religion or evolution, and finally because he is a excellent speaker.



Mind that the sample papers like Inherit the Wind presented are to be used for review only. In order to warn you and eliminate any plagiarism writing intentions, it is highly recommended not to use the essays in class. In cases you experience difficulties with essay writing in class and for in class use, order original papers with our expert writers. Cheap custom papers can be written from scratch for each customer that entrusts his or her academic success to our writing team. Order your unique assignment from the best custom writing services cheap and fast!